![]() She decided to spare him and, fu*k like minks forever. Anyway, the last time she picks up the ice pick to kill Nick, she just couldn't as she was already in love with him. Nick on the other hand completely believed her innocence and actually "fell for the wrong woman" but guess what- at last she also fell for him (this is what she never anticipated actually- thought she could be a master of all the puppets). She then says good bye to Nick and she cries (for real) because she knew she was going to have sex with him one last time and then have to kill him. So she tests Nick's level from the beginning and the night she tells him that the book is finished and the Detective dies, she killed the detective character in the book because she found out that Nick believes that Beth was the mastermind and so he couldn't find the actual killer, now the actual killer is going to kill him- which is herself. She just can't kill him until she finds everything about him- like "the F**k of the century", his challenging character who is not scared of her and wants to the play the "game" even if it means his own death, his above average intelligence and extraordinary observation power etc. She would have, but at each point Nick turns out to be the unexpected character when she thinks she has captured the character of Nick, she finds his new side. The evidence, was planted- Remember when Beth tells Nick to take the cigarettes from the top Drawer- the books were found later in the top drawer- if Beth was the ultimate verdict, why would she risk herself?Ĭatherine didn't dispose off Nick to the end- Why? Beth just happened to be there coincidentally. Beth didn't kill Gus, it was Dobkins, who killed Gus with such cruelty. Beth's drawer and all the straightforward evidence points her to be "the" killer of the movie?Īgain nicely played by Catherine. She knows how human mind works really well), and she also puts up an open kinda challenge that, she will make all the murders happen and describe them in the book but no one can prove that(or make em wanting not to prove, or ignore it, after manipulating their state of mind). Well, Catherine is a writer and a psychologist, it makes sense for her to write a thriller? Not exactly, the book is the live proof that she wants the police to think that the book is an alibi (that's why she talks about it being an alibi in the interrogation scene-You know, shape their thought to course a direction she wants. She knew that she could make em do anything she wants. She is a brilliant psychologist who reads the characters really well. She makes them murder all the people except in the first scene (where she herself murders Johnny Boz). The thing is Beth, Dobkins and Roxy are highly obsessed with Catherine. Garner, Catherine, Hazel Dobkins, Roxy- All have murdered. ![]() Catherine is a brilliant psychologist, who is writing a book (thought to be an alibi), the chapters of which depict the murders happened.Garner (Lisa Hoberman) has been depicted as being obsessed with Catherine. My answer is based on the truthfulness of following premises, as shown in the movie:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |